Northwestern University President’s Statement about BDS

February24

While I may personally have strong misgivings about this resolution, I think it’s important to remember that the 24 senators who voted for this are elected representatives of our students. To simply condemn them for their vote would be wrong, regardless of how any of us feel about the issue. There is also some distinction between this vote and the classic BDS set of resolutions. As a long-time member of Hillel’s International Board, I have, alas, become very well acquainted with the subject over the past decade.

 

You might also want to check our web page (http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/stories/2014/04/northwestern-goes-to-the-middle-east.html) for the story from this past April about how I led a delegation of NU leaders – our deans of the law school, medical school, business school, Medill and many others, twenty one in all – to Israel last year to sign a sister agreement with Tel Aviv University. I am unaware of any other university in the world who visited Israel in recent years to pledge an increase in research and teaching efforts there. I think that says something about how we view the BDS movement. I really do think that in this case it is actions that matter most, not resolutions and statements.

 

As our statement notes, the resolution will go to the Board of Trustees Investment Committee. While I cannot speak for the trustees as it will be their decision, I am confident that they will consider carefully the many potential impacts of taking the action that the student senate passed, both in regard to this particular issue and similar requests that might occur in the future.

 

In the meantime, I want to assure you that I will do everything that is in my power to ensure that Northwestern remains a welcoming and safe place for Jewish students, just as it is for students of all faiths. Northwestern is a place where discourse and debate are not just expected, but encouraged. It is also our clearly stated expectation that those discussions will continue to occur, as they have been among our students, in a manner that is respectful to all members of our community.

 

Again, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and for your interest in, and support of, Northwestern.

 

Morty

 

Morton Schapiro

President and Professor

posted under | Comments Off

Statement by Trinity College on Academic Boycott of Israel

January2

TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN STUDIES ASSOCIATION:

Our Dean of the Faculty, Thomas Mitzel, and I wish to go on record renouncing the boycott of Israel on the part of the ASA. Trinity once years back was an institutional member (we were then advertizing for an open position), and apparently some members of our faculty are individual members. Were we still an institutional member, we would not be any longer after the misguided and unprincipled announcement of the boycott of the only democracy in the Middle East. The Dean and I oppose academic boycotts in general because they can so easily encroach upon academic freedom. In this strange case, why the ASA would propose an academic boycott of Israel and not, for example, of Syria, the Sudan, North Korea, China, Iran, Iraq, or Russia escapes rational thought. Trinity has participated in the Rescue Scholar program since its inception; we have welcomed scholars from some of the most repressive countries on the planet, and it is inconceivable to us that we would ever be welcoming a Rescue Scholar fleeing Israel for political reasons.

As President of the ASA, you have tarnished a once distinguished association.

James F. Jones, Jr.

President and Trinity College Professor
in the Humanities

posted under | Comments Off

Statement of Jewish Organizations on BDS

February4

Statement of Jewish Organizations on Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Campaigns Against Israel

February 2011

Believing that academic, cultural and commercial boycotts, divestments and sanctions of Israel are:

  • Counterproductive to the goal of peace,
  • Antithetical to freedom of speech,
  • Part of a greater effort to undermine the Jewish people’s right to self-determination in their homeland, Israel.

We, the undersigned members of the Jewish community, stand united in our condemnation of calls and campaigns for boycotting, divestment and sanctions of Israeli academic institutions, professors, products and companies that do business with Israel.

We recognize and accept that individuals and groups may have legitimate criticism of Israeli policies. Criticism becomes anti-Semitism, however, when it demonizes Israel or its leaders, denies Israel the right to defend its citizens or seeks to denigrate Israel’s right to exist.

The BDS movement is antithetical to principles of academic freedom and discourages freedom of speech. The movement silences voices from across the Israeli political spectrum. By pursuing delegitimization campaigns on campus, proponents have provoked deep divisions among students and have created an atmosphere of intolerance and hatred.

We oppose the extremist rhetoric of the delegitimization movement and reject calls for boycotting, divestment or sanctions against Israel. We call upon students, faculty, administrators and other campus stakeholders to uphold the academic and democratic values of a free and civil discourse that promotes peace and tolerance.

Natalie Menaged
Aish HaTorah

Andy Borans
Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity

Dr. Mitchell Bard
American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE)

Gerald Platt
American Friend of Likud

Howard Kohr
The American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)

David Harris
American Jewish Committee (AJC)

Karen J. Rubinstein
American Zionist Movement (AZM)

Abraham H. Foxman
Anti-Defamation League (ADL)

Rabbi Robert Orkand
Association of Reform Zionists of America (ARZA)

Dr. Colin Rubenstein, Jeremy Jones
Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council

Daniel S. Mariaschin
B’nai B’rith International

George W. Schaeffer
Bnai Zion

Mr. Vivian Wineman
The Board of Deputies of British Jews

Fred Taub
Boycott Watch

Mauricio Lulka
Central Committee of the Jewish Community of Mexico

Dr. J. Klener
Central Jewish Consistory of Belgium

Malcolm Hoenlein
Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations

David Bernstein
The David Project

Mindy Stein
Emunah of America

Danny Lamm
Executive Council of Australia

Brain Kerner
The Fair Play Campaign Group (UK)

Akiva Tendler
The Fellowship for Campus Safety and Integrity

Nancy Falchuk
Hadassah

Oded Feuer
Hagshama – The Department for Diaspora Activities of the World Zionist Organization

Natalie Menaged
Hasbara Fellowships

Wayne Firestone
Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Adv. Irit Kohn
The International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists

Steve Kuperberg
Israel on Campus Coalition (ICC)

Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi
The Israel Project (TIP)

Dr. Misha Galperin
Jewish Agency for Israel (JAFI)

Conrad Giles, Rabbi Steve Gutow
Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA)

William Daroff
The Jewish Federations of North America

Thomas Neumann
Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA)

Martin M. Schwartz
Jewish Labor Committee

Jeremy Newmark
Jewish Leadership Council

Rabbi Eric M. Lankin
Jewish National Fund (JNF)

Dov H. Maimon
Jewish People Policy Institute (JPPI)

Claudio Epelman
Latin American Jewish Congress

Ron Carner
Maccabi USA/Sports For Israel

Avi Rubel
Masa Israel Journey

Janet Tobin, Rabbi Robert R. Golub
MERCAZ USA

Elizabeth Raider
NA’AMAT USA

Mark Levin
National Conference on Soviet Jewry (NCSJ)

David A. Harris
National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC)

Rabbi Steven Weil
Orthodox Union (OU)

Rabbi Julie Schonfeld
Rabbinical Assembly

Rabbi Yosef Blau
Religious Zionists of America

Matt Brooks
Republican Jewish Committee (RJC)

Leland Manders
Sigma Alpha Mu Fraternity

Amy Krouse
Sigma Delta Tau Sorority

Rabbi Aron Heir
Simon Weisenthal Center

Roz Rothstein
StandWithUs

Rabbi Yoffie, David Saperstein
Union for Reform Judaism (URJ)

Richard Skolnik, Rabbi Steven C. Wernick
United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism

Rabbi Elyse Winick
United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism and campus division KOACH

Sarrae G Crane
Women’s League for Conservative Judaism

Shelley Lindauer
Women of Reform Judaism

Betty Ehrenberg
World Jewish Congress, North America

Oliver Worth
World Union of Jewish Students (WUJS)

Laurence A. Bolotin
Zeta Beta Tau Fraternity

Morton A. Klein
Zionist Organization of America (ZOA)

posted under | Comments Off

Statement by the President of the University of Southern California

January3

Statement by C. L. Max Nikias, President, University of Southern California, on proposed academic and cultural boycotts and sanctions against Israel and Israeli universities and divestment of investments of certain firms involved in Israel

Over the past several years, the University of Southern California has been asked to join academic and cultural boycotts or other sanctions against Israel and/or Israeli universities and to consider divestment of investments in firms that have certain business operations in Israel.

I believe such actions would be a betrayal of our values as a pluralistic university whose students, faculty, and alumni come from more than 110 countries, and who represent a diversity of political, cultural and religious beliefs.

USC is deeply committed to providing the intellectual environment for cooperative and tolerant discourse, respecting the diversity of moral, political and religious views held by its members and working together to better understand the most challenging issues of our time.

December 15, 2010

posted under | Comments Off

Statement of Nobel Laureates on BDS

November5

STATEMENT OF NOBEL LAUREATES ON ACADEMIC BDS ACTIONS AGAINST ISRAELI ACADEMICS, ISRAELI ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS AND ACADEMIC CENTERS AND INSTITUTES OF RESEARCH AND TRAINING WITH AFFILIATIONS IN ISRAEL

By Roger Kornberg, Stanford University and Steven Weinberg, University of Texas at Austin

Published in: A Project of the Scholars for Peace in the Middle East Task Force on Boycotts, Divestments and Sanctions October 28, 2010

Statement of Nobel Laureates on Academic BDS Actions against Israeli Academics, Israeli Academic Institutions and Academic Centers and Institutes of Research and Training With Affiliations in Israel
Believing that academic and cultural boycotts, divestments and sanctions in the academy are:

* antithetical to principles of academic and scientific freedom,
* antithetical to principles of freedom of expression and inquiry, and
* may well constitute discrimination by virtue of national origin,

We, the undersigned Nobel Laureates, appeal to students, faculty colleagues and university officials to defeat and denounce calls and campaigns for boycotting, divestment and sanctions against Israeli academics, academic institutions and university-based centers and institutes for training and research, affiliated with Israel.

Furthermore, we encourage students, faculty colleagues and university officials to promote and provide opportunities for civil academic discourse where parties can engage in the search for resolution to conflicts and problems rather than serve as incubators for polemics, propaganda, incitement and further misunderstanding and mistrust.

We, and many like us, have dedicated ourselves to improving the human condition by doing the often difficult and elusive work to understand complex and seemingly unsolvable phenomena. We believe that the university should serve as an open, tolerant and respectful, cooperative and collaborative community engaged in practices of resolving complex problems.

Sidney Altman
Yale University
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1989
Walter Kohn
University of California Santa Barbara
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1998
Kenneth Arrow
Stanford University
Nobel Prize in Economics, 1972
Roger D. Kornberg
Stanford University
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 2006
Robert J. Aumann
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Nobel Prize in Economics, 2005
Harold Kroto
Florida State University
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1996
Mario Capecchi
University of Utah
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 2007
Finn Kydland
University of California Santa Barbara
Nobel Prize in Economics, 2004
Aaron Ciechanover
Technion
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 2004
Leon Lederman
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Nobel Prize in Physics, 1988
Claude Cohen-Tannoudji
École Normale Supérieure
Nobel Prize in Physics, 1997
Tony Leggett
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Nobel Prize in Physics, 2003
Robert Curl
Rice University
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1996
Robert Lucas, Jr.
University of Chicago
Nobel Prize in Economics, 1995
Edmond H. Fischer
University of Washington
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1992
Rudolph A. Marcus
California Institute of Technology
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1992
Jerome Friedman
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Nobel Prize in Physics, 1990
Roger Myerson
University of Chicago
Nobel Prize in Economics, 2007
Andre Geim
Manchester University
Nobel Prize in Physics, 2010
George A. Olah
University of Southern California
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1994
Sheldon Glashow
Boston University
Nobel Prize in Physics, 1979
Douglas Osheroff
Stanford University
Nobel Prize in Physics, 1996
David Gross
University of California Santa Barbara
Nobel Prize in Physics, 2004
Martin L. Perl
Stanford University
Nobel Prize in Physics, 1995
James Heckman
University of Chicago
Nobel Prize in Economics, 2000
Andrew V. Schally
University of Miami
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1977
Avram Hershko
Technion
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 2004
Richard R. Schrock
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 2005
Roald Hoffman
Cornell University
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1981
Phillip A. Sharp
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1993
Russell Hulse
University of Texas Dallas
Nobel Prize in Physics, 1993
Steven Weinberg
University of Texas at Austin
Nobel Prize in Physics, 1979
Tim Hunt
London Research Institute
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 2001
Elie Wiesel
Nobel Peace Prize, 1986
Daniel Kahneman
Princeton University
Nobel Prize in Economics, 2002
Torsten Wiesel
Rockefeller University
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1981
Eric Kandel
Columbia University
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 2000
Lawrence Klein

University of Pennsylvania

Nobel Prize in Economics, 1980

posted under | Comments Off

Michigan State University Jewish Studies Department Statement on BDS

September25

May 2009

MSU Jewish Studies hails MSU’s decision to honor Archbishop Tutu for his important contributions to the freedom struggle in Africa, his Nobel Prize (1984), and his continued activism on behalf of the oppressed - in Sudan (Darfur), Zimbabwe, Timor, and elsewhere. He is a deserving candidate.

However, MSU Jewish Studies also speaks against Archbishop Tutu`s contemporary position on Israel, which rests on a false analysis of the Israel-Palestinian conflict, is antagonistic to academic freedom and the values of the university, and is counterproductive in the search for an end to occupation and the establishment of peace.

First, in his speech some time ago, “Israel Should Heed The Lessons of Scripture - and Apartheid,” given at Old South Church in Boston, November 27, 2007, Tutu expresses his affinity with the Hebrew people, their bible, and their tradition. This tradition that aligns with the oppressed and downtrodden was an inspiration, he says, in the freedom struggle against apartheid. It is a prophetic tradition and a tradition of kindness, compassion, and caring.

But, Archbishop Tutu charges, it is a tradition from which Israel today is truant in dealing with Palestine. It is this tradition that Israel ignores in creating checkpoints, an “illegal wall,” and things even South Africa didn’t do, like “collective punishment.”

Subtly shifting focus back and forth between Israel the Jews and Israel the state, Tutu says: Israel should be on the side of the God of Exodus, Israel should be with the oppressed - this is “your calling” - to remember “what happened to you in Egypt and much more recently in Germany” - Israel should behave differently.

For Tutu, a Christian cleric, the Jews have a “divine calling” and Israel should act in accord with it in dealing with the Palestinians.

But while we share some of Tutu’s view, especially his desire for negotiations leading to peace and a two state solution, what sort of affinity and commitment to kindness and compassion, we ask, is it that constructs the Jewish people as having a calling for justice when they suffer but derides them when they take defensive measures or fight back against suicide bombing and terror?

What kind of felt affinity and kindness is it that acknowledges Israel’s suffering as its calling, but identifies not at all with Israel’s yearning and aspiration (like Palestinians’ yearning and aspiration) for self-determination and security?

Why is it that Archbishop Tutu does not acknowledge that Israel has seriously negotiated for years at Oslo, Wye, Camp David, Taba, and since, and that Israelis have consistently demonstrated that Israel would leave the West Bank if they will no longer be attacked.

Why is it that Archbishop Tutu does not acknowledge that a serious obstacle to peace is the drift among Palestinian leadership to viewing the conflict as a religious one?

Second, the U.S. Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel calls on people and institutions to one-sidedly boycott Israeli academic and cultural institutions until Israeli occupation ends, Israeli Arabs achieve equal rights, and the right of return for all Palestinian refugees and their descendants, wherever born, is recognized.

In this boycott campaign, it is only Israel and it is Israel alone that is targeted -no other nation in the world, no other academic or cultural institutions, no other people. The Israel-Palestinian conflict is central but only Israel is seen as an actor - not Fatah, not Hamas, not others. Who opposes negotiations for a two-state solution? Israel or Hamas?

The conflict is also likened to the earlier conflict over apartheid in South Africa and Israel is demonized as evil by the false analogy. Israel is not an apartheid or racist state and the Israel-Palestinian conflict is a conflict between rival national movements for national self-determination, not a conflict between colonizers and the colonized. That is why the UN voted partition for Palestine and called for two states and the self-determination of two peoples in 1948.

The campaign for boycott also seeks to impose an embargo on academics and performers based completely on their national origins, and to limit academic freedom in American universities to hear all sides of the conflict from representatives of all viewpoints. It represents an attack on the idea of the university, as President Lou Anna Simon earlier emphasized, and would reduce a complex conflict between two peoples to a slogan.

The campaign for boycott also threatens what we do in MSU Jewish Studies, where among other things we study Israel and its region, have exchange relations with Israeli universities, send students to study there, administer scholarships to support students to study at Israeli universities, and regularly invite and host Israeli speakers, performers, filmmakers and films at MSU to inform about the conflict and about Israel (and Palestine) also beyond the conflict.

Finally, the call for boycott evokes the feel of similar boycotts in modern Jewish history, blaming the Jews and only the Jews (Israel) for complex issues in public life and spreading a discourse in which Zionism and the Jewish state are especially vilified. True efforts for peace should and would do otherwise.

Kenneth Waltzer

Director-MSU Jewish Studies Department

Related Resources:

Jerusalem Post’s “An Open letter to Tutu

posted under | Comments Off

Statements Against BDS Bigotry

August5

A number of statements have already been drafted that can be used if BDS initiatives are launched on your campus or that can be used preemptively to discourage them. You may want to have students, faculty and administrators sign on to one of these statements or to draft your own using their language as a model. For example:

Endorse Red Lines Against Delegitimization

UC Irvine Faculty Denounce Hate Speech

University of California Statement on Divestment

Tony Blair on BDS

Former ASA President: Boycott of Israel a “Big Mistake”

posted under | Comments Off

University of California Statement on Divestment

August3

May 2010

Russell Gould, Chairman, Board of Regents
Sherry L. Lansing, Vice Chair, Board of Regents
Mark G. Yudof, President of the University

Recently, there have been two bills put forward for a vote before student organizations within the University of California that call on the University to divest from companies doing business with Israel. Understandably, these bills have received considerable attention from the public and the media.

The overarching question of the University of California divesting from any company is a complex one and any action considered must conform to State and federal laws, as well as to the University’s fiduciary responsibilities as a public entity to protect the security of its pension and endowment funds. In 2005, the Regents stated that a policy of divestment from a foreign government shall be adopted by the University only when the United States government declares that a foreign regime is committing acts of genocide. It was also noted at the time that divestment is a serious decision that should be rarely pursued.

We share The Regents’ belief that divestment needs to be undertaken with caution. We firmly believe that if there is to be any discussion of divestment from a business or country, it must be robust and fair-minded. We must take great care that no one organization or country is held to a different standard than any other. In the current resolutions voted on by the UC student organizations, the State of Israel and companies doing business with Israel have been the sole focus. This isolation of Israel among all countries of the world greatly disturbs us and is of grave concern to members of the Jewish community.

We fully support the Board of Regents in its policy to divest from a foreign government or companies doing business with a foreign government only when the United States government declares that a foreign regime is committing acts of genocide. The U.S. has not made any declaration regarding the State of Israel and, therefore, we will not bring a recommendation before the Board to divest from companies doing business with the State of Israel.

posted under | Comments Off

2015 BDS Current Events

January9

March 11 - UCLA Student Council Condemns Anti-Semitism and Anti-Israel Hate Speech

February 24 - University of Georgia Passes Pro-Israel Resolution

February 24 - Northwestern University President’s Statement about BDS

February 22 - Boycott Israel Movement Stunts the Palestinian Economy

February 2 - Hamas on Campus at the University of California, Davis

January 29 - Anti-Israel BDS Movement is Fashionable in Academia, But Far from Invincible

January 28 - Does Northwestern Student Group Aim to Respect Palestine or Demonize Israel

January 24 - Palestinian Boycott of Israel is Misguided

January 9 - Knesset Report: BDS Movement Has No Impact on Economy

January 7 - Five Prominent University of Illinois Professors Support Decision to not Hire Steven Salaita

January 4 - American Historical Association (AHA) Rejects Anti-Israel Resolutions

January 2 - The Truth Behind BDS {video}

posted under | Comments Off

BDS Intimidation

March13

Because BDS is a fundamentally radical and anti-peace movement at heart, its supporters are often prone to displays of violence and intimidation designed to bully others into compliance. This page tracks examples of BDS proponents using intimidation and threats, both on the Internet and in the real world, to pursue their goals. This can often include committing crimes as well.

BDS Intimidation on Campus

BDS Intimidation in Support of Cultural Boycott

BDS Intimidation of Musicians

BDS Intimidation in Support of Economic Boycott

BDS Intimidation in Support of Cultural Boycott

In Auckland, New Zealand, in the fall of 2011, a group calling themselves Global Peace and Justice Auckland gathered together to protest the young Israeli tennis star Shahar Peer, who was about to play her opening match at the ASB tennis classic. Though they claimed to be merely against Israel’s governmental policies, one carried the placard “the Zionists are the Nazis of the Middle East.” Eight protesters were arrested for making excessive noise that annoyed tennis players and spectators, and six were convicted of disorderly behavior, though New Zealand’s High Court overturned the conviction.

BDS supporters have crossed the line between legitimate protest and criminal behavior on many occasions. In Edinburgh, Scotland in October of 2012 BDS supporters brought their protest against the Batsheva Dance Company into the theater itself. The protesters disrupted the shows repeated, standing up and harassing the dancers as well as the audience. Audience members present felt “alarmed and vulnerable” according to Jackie Kemp of the Guardian. Despite this, no arrests were made.

When Israel’s Habima Theater Company was invited to perform The Merchant of Venice for the Globe Theatre in London, UK in the summer of 2013, BDS supporters pulled out all the stops to try and prevent them. Three dozen British celebrities, including actress Emma Thompson, wrote a letter to the Globe to try to convince them to cancel, allegedly because Habima had performed in Israeli settlements. When the Globe refused, the BDS proponents took matters into their own hands, disrupting the performance through shouting, waving banners and disturbing other audience members. Many were removed by security officials, six who had to be physically picked up when they refused to stop screaming or to leave. A protester was arrested on suspicion of assault after a security guard was injured. Despite this intimidating behavior, the Habima performance continued.

Also in London, in the fall of 2011 the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra was invited to play in the BBC Proms. Again, supporters of the cultural boycotting arm of BDS demanded that the BBC cancel the concert. And again the BDS supporters refused to take “no” for an answer and 12 activists disrupted the concert both inside and out, thereby forcing the Proms to go off the air temporarily for the first time in its history. BDS activists bragged about their “victory.”

In the spring of 2013, Yossi Reshef, a pianist whose only connection to Israel is that he was born there, was stopped from playing at the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa by screaming, vuvuzela-blowing protesters. Members of his audience were traumatized and manhandled. Ten student protesters were found guilty of misconduct for disruption or incitement, and were expelled from the University for one year.

Unfortunately this did not stick, because BDS struck again that fall with a protest against Daniel Zamir, an Israeli saxophonist. This time the protesters made international headlines when they chanted “Shoot the Jew” outside of the concert hall. Muhammad Desai, the BDS coordinator, tried to play down the incident and claimed the chants had been misinterpreted. Unfortunately for him, his fellow BDS advocates immediately distanced themselves from the protesters’ behavior and even criticized him personally.

In the Spring of 2014, a local art exhibit featuring the work of Israeli and Palestinian artists in Pittsburgh was forced was forced to shut down due to threats made by BDS advocates against the Palestinian artists for the crime of “normalizing relations with Israel.”

An Israeli theatre company called Incubator Theatre was scheduled to perform in Edinburgh in late July of 2014 but was forced to cancel after threats and protests from BDS supporters. According to reports on the ground, the protesters spat on a 14 year old girl and screamed at children (who weren’t even going to see the Israelis) that “you’ve got blood on your ticket.” Fortunately Incubator performed to sell out crowds in Glasgow, London, and Leeds. The ugliness of the BDS supporters was even noticed by the local media.

In New York City the Israeli basketball team Maccabi Tel Aviv came to play a friendly game against the Brooklyn Nets. But when BDS is in town, no friendliness is allowed. Arguments and protests took place during the game, and after it was over a BDS supporter assaulted Leonard Petlakh, breaking his nose and requiring him to receive eight stitches. Police billed the incident as a hate crime.

An award-winning Israeli filmmaker screened a film in Carpentras, France, or rather tried to before BDS got involved. While she was introducing the film, 20 BDS supporters stood up and began yelling insults while throwing stink bombs. They had to be removed by the police by force. A Palestinian from Gaza who was present at the screening told them to stop, that “this was not the way,” but they carried on protesting outside the theater, free from police interference, even though they did not have a permit. The Israeli filmmaker had to be escorted to her home by the police.

BDS intimidation has even made it to Ramallah where a group of activists disrupted a performance by an Indian dance group who had also performed in Israel. The Palestinian Authority arrested four of them and charged with “provoking riots and breach of public tranquility.” Khaled Abu Toameh explains:

A PA official in Ramallah explained that BDS and its followers make the Palestinians appear as if they are all radicals who are only interested in boycotting and delegitimizing Israel. “This goes against the PLO’s official policy, which is to seek a peace agreement with Israel based on the two-state solution,” he said.

BDS Intimidation of Musicians

Musicians coming to play in Israel are often threatened with boycotts, marginalization, or even death by BDS supporters. Scooter Braun, the manager of teen singer Justin Bieber, said that he had received “plenty of death threats from different groups over him coming to Israel [in 2011]. But most of the death threats were that ‘the Jew manager will die.’” Eric Burdon, the vocalist of the 1960s band The Animals, almost canceled his August 1st show in Israel because of threats. “We’ve been receiving mounting pressure, including numerous emails, daily,” his management said. The management of Salif Keita, a superstar of Afropop, canceled his performance in Israel because:

“[We were] bombarded with hundreds of threats, blackmail attempts, intimidation, social media harassment, and slander…These threats were made by a group named BDS, who also threatened to keep increasing an anti-Salif Keita campaign, which they had already started on social media, and to work diligently at ruining the reputation and career that Mr. Keita has worked 40 years to achieve not only professionally, but for human rights and albinism.”

Just about every prominent artist that performs in Israel will be targeted in this manner. There have also been rumors that Paul McCartney was threatened in 2008 and that Macy Gray’s family was threatened when she performed in Israel in 2011. Protests against the Pet Shop Boys immediately took on a personal tone, prompting a response from the band itself.

When asked to condemn this threatening and highly illegal behavior committed in its name, the leadership of BDS traditionally begins by accusing the victims of lying or exaggerating the claims before attempting to distance their movement from the threats:

Recent claims of threats from ex-Animals singer Eric Burdon in an article published by Ha’aretz are vague and unsubstantiated. We do not know if they are made up by media hostile to the BDS strategy, or by artists and/or their agents, or if they are inflated reports of remarks made by individuals who do not represent the movement. USACBI advances the BDS movement not through threats, but rather by exposing Israel’s wrongs, and promoting non-violent ways to redress them, and achieve the rights of the Palestinian people.”-US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel

“[He is] resort[ing] to unsupported claims of “threats” and potentially defamatory statements may be a tactic that some artists resort to when they do not wish to violate the Palestinian call to boycott Israel, but do not have the courage to take a political stance….Burdon did in fact travel to Israel despite the supposed “threats.”-Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel

Although it may be true that death threats against musicians performing in Israel were not officially made by BDS campaigns, it is also true that BDS supporters encourage their fellows to harass chosen targets with virtual lynch mobs, and they don’t hesitate to make it personal. The rapport between those making the threats and BDS as a whole might be compared to that between a Mafia hitman and godfather; they are very clearly working toward the same goal even if they have no formal relationship.

The manager of French musician Jacky Terrasson wrote a scathing attack on BDS in January of 2013 after an unsuccessful campaign to “convince” him to cancel a performance in Israel:

“We noticed that Erik and Jacky’s Facebook pages were overrun with intimidating comments, not from our fans, but from activists. Some of these comments are really obnoxious, rising to the level of sheer harassment and blatant denigration. Facebook has become a battleground for BDS campaigners, our fans, Israelis and those supporting Israel. How sad!”

He even wrote a letter to the BDS campaign in France:

“We refuse to be made into instruments, and we won’t give in to your pressure, whether by email, by mail, by telephone or on Facebook…Your activism and your intolerance are abominable. Phony Facebook “fans” have posted messages expressly asking our musicians not play in Israel. This is sheer harassment. Moreover, it’s really quite surprising because these fans purporting to sway the artists are not fans at all, but simply your army of little soldiers polluting the calm and positive spaces of our artists’ Facebook pages.

What bothers me the most about your effort…is your hatred of Israel, a pathological hatred, blind and most assuredly hidden behind a veil of “political correctness.” Your actions don’t demonstrate a love or defense of Palestinians but rather a hatred for Israelis.”

When Sir Elton John announced in 2010 that he was planning a concert in Tel Aviv, he received a long communication from the British Committee for the Universities of Palestine that could be interpreted as nothing else but an attack on him: “When you stand up on that stage in Tel Aviv, you line yourself up with a racist state.” Despite this, Sir Elton went ahead with the concert explaining that nothing was “gonna stop me from playing here” and that musicians aren’t supposed to “cherry pick our conscience.”

Alicia Keys was defiant in the face of BDS when she performed in Israel in July of 2013, despite claims by Roger Waters that doing so would mean she would “lend your name to give legitimacy to the Israeli government policies of illegal, apartheid occupation.” Alice Walker also wrote to Keys saying that she must boycott Israel to “save your soul.”

BDS Intimidation in Support of Economic Boycott

Generally BDS intimidation in support of economic boycotts takes the form of standing outside a shop known to be selling Israeli products and scaring people away from it. However it often escalates into attacking the store, its products, or its customers.

In Melbourne, Australia, in the summer of 2011, protests against the chocolate store Max Brenner became more and more radical. Paul Howes, the Australian Workers Union secretary, said he thought the protesters were “mimicking the behaviour of the Nazis thugs.” It is also worth noting that Australians for Palestine did not join forces with the Brenner protesters. 11 protesters were arrested and charged with “besetting premises” and “willful trespass in a public place,” though this was later overturned in court.

A group called “the Nesheron Gathering” in Amman, Jordan is intimidating stores into not selling Israeli products through depictions of a bloody Israeli flag over the products in question.

The most famous example of BDS intimidation in support of economic boycott was the furor over Scarlett Johansson appearing in a Sodastream ad that would air during the 2014 Super Bowl. Due to Johansson’s celebrity status, BDS proponents were unable to use the usual intimidation tactics that had served them in the past. Having failed to force FOX to pull the ad they helplessly attacked Johansson from the safety of the Internet: creating insulting depictions of her in memes, videos, and cartoons, which they then spread through social media. BDS supporters also tried to convince Oxfam, a charity for which Johansson is a global ambassador, to fire her over the ad. However, Johansson took the initiative and resigned, leaving BDS with nothing but anger.

In London, UK, there was an Israeli cosmetic store in Covent Garden. It sold Ahava products, which have long been a target for BDS, and so weekly protests took place there for four years. Four demonstrators were arrested and forced to pay a fine in 2011 after they chained themselves to a concrete block inside the store. However, the store was ultimately forced to close when the landlord did not renew its lease due to complaints from nearby store owners who claimed that the riots had affected their sales. “On some Saturdays it was a real nightmare being here,” one said. “We couldn’t walk on the street because of the protests and the area looked like a scene of a terrorist attack.”

In Birmingham, UK, 100 demonstrators gathered to protest at Tesco store in Hodge Hill, claiming to be inspired by the current conflict in Gaza. They entered the shop and immediately began destroying property there, taking pictures of the damaged products and spreading them through social media. According to witnesses, they were “getting aggressive” toward innocent shoppers and staff.

“If they say it was peaceful. It was anything but a peaceful protest inside the store.”

One person was arrested for assaulting a police officer and two more were escorted off the premises. Local MP (and BDS ally) Shabana Mahmood condemned the boycotters:

“Shoving people, intimidating people and throwing things as I am told happened by a small group of people at the Hodge Hill Tesco on Saturday are not the actions of people committed to taking part in a peaceful protest movement. It’s criminal behaviour that damages the cause that we fight for.”

In Cape Town, South Africa a group of boycott supporters proved their anti-Semitic and radical nature by bringing a severed pigs head into a store that carried Israeli products, ostensibly to prevent “people who will not eat pork to pretend that they are eating clean meat, when it is sold by hands dripping with the blood of Palestinian children.” It’s hard to see how this could be interpreted as anything other than an attempt to keep Jewish people out of the store. Although this group was not a part of the South African BDS campaign, the BDSers wasted no time in justifying their behavior. The South African Jewish Board of Deputies treated the incident as a hate crime.

posted under | Comments Off
« Older Entries